The Pendulum of Economic Justice

First, the Oligarchs stole it from the Workers by diverting 95% of the value added by the Workers into the Oligarch's profits.  (I say that 10%-20% is plenty of a return on investment...not 80%-90%).  This is possible only with monolopy behavior supported by corrupt laws.

Then, the Workers took back a chunk of those profits (which...should have been the worker's in the first place) in the form of progressive taxation. (Although, this still doesn't mark a complete return of the stolen wealth to the Workers...but, instead to Government programs that benefit the Workers...a far cry from true self-control of resources.)

Then, the Oligarchs once again took back those profits they stole from the Workers with a government that does not represent the Will of The People through Gerrymandering, voter suppression and conservative court packing.

Billionares and Trillionares should not exist.  The only way for anyone to hoard that much wealth is by claiming resources that they did not produce themselves.

If we had a Living Wage and Just Profit Sharing, everyone would have all the resources they would need to thrive in whatever manner they choose for themselves.  

The Congress - A Delicate Balance Between Rural and Urban Inhabitants of America

The Senate was always designed to give additional weight to rural areas.  I think that was to make sure the the understandable economic strength of dense urban centers did not result in power being unbalanced to benefit citizens in cities.  

I think that is wise...unless the balance shifts too far giving rural voters too much power compared to the increased power for dense population centers.  This is very subjective.

This varies from the House, which (without Gerrymandering) would be an excellent body to represent The Will of The People.

The Congress is meant to represent The People and to Legislate by majority (with some additional weight in the Senate to rural voters, as mentioned for the above reason).

So, the Senate Filibuster and House Gerrymandering are two processes that destroy the intricate balance that our Founders built into Our Constitution.  If either are so supported by The People, they can be enshrined in Our Constitution by Amendment.

But short of that, either can be banned by a simple Majority of the Congress since neither the Filibuster nor Gerrymandering are protected in the Constitution.

Abolishing the Filibuster and Gerrymandering will not destroy the Constitution and our Country; it will restore it to its promise of a Government Of The People, By The People and For the People.